<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crashwards and Onwards&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urgentartist.org/2010/02/crashwards-and-onwards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urgentartist.org/2010/02/crashwards-and-onwards/</link>
	<description>Media, Meta, + Mess from artists who live by their work</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:48:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: emily</title>
		<link>http://urgentartist.org/2010/02/crashwards-and-onwards/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 04:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urgentartist.org/?p=401#comment-113</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m working on getting caught up on things... work, blog reading...
Sorry I couldn&#039;t make it out to the show, was just too exhausted going into Monday!

Thanks much for posting the video though. And here are some thoughts which may or may not be answers to your questions!

-This was interesting for me to watch since I saw the first showing of this.
-I love the music still, what it adds to the rhythmic parts but also that it&#039;s chill and not distracting. Those parts are very slick and precise, but without losing their humanity.
-At the beginning at least, I saw Ilona as Cristina&#039;s supporter. I wanted to know more about that. Maybe she was actually her ghost or her alter-ego. Maybe it&#039;s foreshadowing or harking back to the Ilona/Rowan stuff - the two couples paralleling each other in a way?
-I found this version easier to watch in terms of not feeling my focus was pulled in too many directions at once. It may be partially because I know the material a little bit now, but also I think it has a better rhythm of attention-grabbing that flows between the duet and the dancers in black.
-Who are the dancers in black? At different points they seemed like helpers to the duet, impairments to them, pieces of furniture, dreams or thoughts of the couple.
-The duet: fast lift evolving.
-It was hard to tell, probably just because of the camera angle, what is Cristina doing at the end?

Hope this is helpful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m working on getting caught up on things&#8230; work, blog reading&#8230;<br />
Sorry I couldn&#8217;t make it out to the show, was just too exhausted going into Monday!</p>
<p>Thanks much for posting the video though. And here are some thoughts which may or may not be answers to your questions!</p>
<p>-This was interesting for me to watch since I saw the first showing of this.<br />
-I love the music still, what it adds to the rhythmic parts but also that it&#8217;s chill and not distracting. Those parts are very slick and precise, but without losing their humanity.<br />
-At the beginning at least, I saw Ilona as Cristina&#8217;s supporter. I wanted to know more about that. Maybe she was actually her ghost or her alter-ego. Maybe it&#8217;s foreshadowing or harking back to the Ilona/Rowan stuff &#8211; the two couples paralleling each other in a way?<br />
-I found this version easier to watch in terms of not feeling my focus was pulled in too many directions at once. It may be partially because I know the material a little bit now, but also I think it has a better rhythm of attention-grabbing that flows between the duet and the dancers in black.<br />
-Who are the dancers in black? At different points they seemed like helpers to the duet, impairments to them, pieces of furniture, dreams or thoughts of the couple.<br />
-The duet: fast lift evolving.<br />
-It was hard to tell, probably just because of the camera angle, what is Cristina doing at the end?</p>
<p>Hope this is helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marie</title>
		<link>http://urgentartist.org/2010/02/crashwards-and-onwards/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urgentartist.org/?p=401#comment-112</guid>
		<description>AH! I&#039;m so proud! I saw this in progress and pieces and let me tell you...this looks so good! It is great to see it with everyone in their real places and in such shnazzzy costumes! Every part of the piece that seemed off or rushed or almost manic I was able to justify or make sense of (if that makes sense.) It hard for me to know if seeing it for the first time I&#039;d be able  to do that based on the narrative I was creating for myself, but the narrative I know of the piece based on what you guys have told me makes perfect sense with how this turned out. 
Miss you! and again. AMAZING JOB
&lt;3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AH! I&#8217;m so proud! I saw this in progress and pieces and let me tell you&#8230;this looks so good! It is great to see it with everyone in their real places and in such shnazzzy costumes! Every part of the piece that seemed off or rushed or almost manic I was able to justify or make sense of (if that makes sense.) It hard for me to know if seeing it for the first time I&#8217;d be able  to do that based on the narrative I was creating for myself, but the narrative I know of the piece based on what you guys have told me makes perfect sense with how this turned out.<br />
Miss you! and again. AMAZING JOB<br />
&lt;3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
